JPR: Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance  Review
Signup for JPR Updates
News and Meetings
06.18.10: Meeting Agenda - June 23, 2010
[ READ MORE ]
06.18.10: Meeting Notice - June 23, 2010
[ READ MORE ]
06.18.10: Meeting Agenda - June 23, 2010
[ READ MORE ]
06.18.10: Commission to Vote on Performance of Justices and Judges on 2010 General Election Ballot
[ READ MORE ]
bottom of table
Who Judges the Judges? You Do! We Can Help. Judicial Performance Reports
Maricopa Voters Only
Two members did not vote on this report.
   
Hon. Crane McClennen
Assignment During Survey Period: Juvenile
Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1997
View Bio
59% of the Commission Voted Judge McClennen DOES NOT MEET Judicial Performance Standards
10 Commissioners Voted "Meets"
17 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"
Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories
Attorney Responses
Surveys
Distributed: 135
Returned: 44

Detailed Report
Litigant/Witness/
ProPer Responses

Surveys
Distributed: 162
Returned: 12
Detailed Report
Juror Responses
Surveys
Distributed: 0
Returned:
 
Score (See Footnote)
Score (See Footnote)
Score (See Footnote)
Legal Ability
90%
N/A
N/A
Integrity
83%
100%
N/A
Communication Skills
78%
79%
N/A
Judicial Temperament
60%
88%
N/A
Administrative Performance
71%
86%
N/A
Settlement Activities
80%
N/A
N/A

FOOTNOTE: The score is the percentage of all evaluators who rated the judge "satisfactory", "very good", or "superior" in each of the Commission's evaluation categories. Depending on the assignment, a judge may not have responses in certain categories, indicated by N/A (for example, some judicial assignments do not require jury trials).
The JPR Commission votes "Yes" or "No" on whether a judge "MEETS" Judicial Performance Standards, based on the statistical information as well as any other information submitted by the public or the judge. Further information on the judges and justices can be found at each court's website.

 
Home Privacy Policy 2005 Judicial Performance Review