 |
 |
 |
Judicial Performance Standards
Evaluation Categories |
|
|
|
Litigant/Witness/
ProPer Responses
Surveys
Distributed: 54
Returned: 5
Detailed Report |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
Score (See Footnote) |
Score (See Footnote) |
Score (See Footnote) |
| Legal Ability |
96% |
N/A |
N/A |
| Integrity |
97% |
100% |
100% |
| Communication Skills |
95% |
100% |
100% |
| Judicial Temperament |
96% |
100% |
100% |
| Administrative Performance |
99% |
100% |
100% |
| Settlement Activities |
94% |
N/A |
N/A |
 |
FOOTNOTE: The score is the percentage of all evaluators who rated the judge "satisfactory", "very good", or "superior" in each of the Commission's evaluation categories. Depending on the assignment, a judge may not have responses in certain categories, indicated by N/A (for example, some judicial assignments do not require jury trials).
The JPR Commission votes "Yes" or "No" on whether a judge "MEETS"
Judicial Performance Standards, based on the statistical information as well as any other information submitted by the public or the judge.
Further information on the judges and justices can be found at each court's website. |