JPR: Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance  Review
Signup for JPR Updates
News and Meetings
06.18.10: Meeting Agenda - June 23, 2010
[ READ MORE ]
06.18.10: Meeting Notice - June 23, 2010
[ READ MORE ]
06.18.10: Meeting Agenda - June 23, 2010
[ READ MORE ]
06.18.10: Commission to Vote on Performance of Justices and Judges on 2010 General Election Ballot
[ READ MORE ]
bottom of table
Who Judges the Judges? You Do! We Can Help. Judicial Performance Reports
Maricopa Voters Only
   
Hon. John C. Rea
Assignment During Survey Period: Civil
Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2004
View Bio
100% of the Commission Voted Judge Rea MEETS Judicial Performance Standards
27 Commissioners Voted "Meets"
0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"
Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories
Attorney Responses
Surveys
Distributed: 281
Returned: 63

Detailed Report
Litigant/Witness/
ProPer Responses

Surveys
Distributed: 48
Returned: 7
Detailed Report
Juror Responses
Surveys
Distributed: 46
Returned: 32
Detailed Report
 
Score (See Footnote)
Score (See Footnote)
Score (See Footnote)
Legal Ability
94%
N/A
N/A
Integrity
99%
100%
100%
Communication Skills
96%
100%
100%
Judicial Temperament
98%
100%
100%
Administrative Performance
96%
100%
100%
Settlement Activities
91%
N/A
N/A

FOOTNOTE: The score is the percentage of all evaluators who rated the judge "satisfactory", "very good", or "superior" in each of the Commission's evaluation categories. Depending on the assignment, a judge may not have responses in certain categories, indicated by N/A (for example, some judicial assignments do not require jury trials).
The JPR Commission votes "Yes" or "No" on whether a judge "MEETS" Judicial Performance Standards, based on the statistical information as well as any other information submitted by the public or the judge. Further information on the judges and justices can be found at each court's website.

 
Home Privacy Policy 2005 Judicial Performance Review